It was the best of art it was the worst of art (My personal best and worst picks from the show)
Chapter 3 of my Review of Southampton Solent’s Mid-Year show for the first two chapters check out my previous blog post!
If I credit the wrong artist or title to a work I am deeply sorry and let me know and I will change it straight away. It’s hard to keep track when so many works were untitled.
From Worst to Best:
“Walking Dead Study” by Georgina Grahame.
Although titled I am still confused by this work. As an artist and employee at a comic book shop with a personal and professional interest in human anatomy and the Walking Dead comic and TV show, what exactly is this a study of? Incorrectness? How not to draw a person? No person, or zombie, has a torso that long or misaligned, especially in scale with that small head and disturbingly high pectoral muscles and why is Michonne’s (the woman in the centre of the image) arm so short and malformed? But mainly the arm holding the sword. The other arm, for that is what I am assuming that line is representing on the right side of the body, is almost full length, although you can’t really tell what with the disturbingly high crotch line. Also why are none of the characters in scale with each other? There is no excuse for so much to be wrong with such a simple drawing. Especially with so many reference images available (just type Walking Dead Michonne into google and you will see what I mean)this is one of the most iconic scenes from the Walking Dead recognised by even the most casual of fan and used very publically. With so many references available I have no idea why this is drawn so badly. Although I suppose the artist should get points for the fact I can at least recognise what it is meant to be without the title? Actually no I’m sorry I just can’t. Words cannot accurately convey the rage I have for this piece especially when the zombies drawn SHOULD NOT HAVE JAWS! There is NO reason for them to have them. Michonne as a character on the TV show AND in the comic removed the zombie’s jaws and arms so they could not harm her whilst she had them chained to her to hide her scent to other zombies. Art rage and comic book rage in one! I would like to know in what world this is a study and what the ‘artist’ was trying to study. WRONG!

“Purging Femininity” by Louisa Hamidi
From talking to people at the show I know this is a self-portrait but that still doesn’t explain the motion blur. If you are doing a self-portrait that you were going to print so large surely you would want it of the highest quality and use a tripod. Why was it printed on canvas and then not stretched onto a frame? I can see no reason that this would be an artistic choice and when there is an art technician in a workshop just round the corner willing to help or even do it for you, what is your excuse? This photograph doesn’t do justice to the sheer imbalance of colour due to the artist’s ineptitude in setting the white balance, in this image. I repeat, when working in the photographic medium you need to actually learn to use a camera. There is never an excuse for white balance issues. Even my Everyman knew that something was wrong with the image and realised why by themselves and they never touch cameras. The public isn’t stupid. Don’t treat them as such with your laziness.
Overheard quotes describing what the work looked like;
“the end of a good night out!”
“like someone just jizzed pink cum all over her face”
“clown blowjob”
“make up explosion”
Was this the reaction you were looking for?

“Untitled” by Jessica Poole
This ‘artist’s’ work unfortunately insults me on so many layers as an artist. If I was a lecturer this would be an instant fail. It has absolutely no redeeming features that I can find. Not even a title to clarify a meaning to its rubbishness.
Untitled. CHECK. Poster paint used instead of higher quality paint for no discernible reason. CHECK. No artistic skill or effort at all. CHECK. Not put up properly (Blue tack AND pins, not even one or the other) CHECK. Pencil lines left on the wall because they didn’t bother to clean it off. CHECK. Lack of any discernable perspective (What is this supposed to be? I don’t know!) CHECK.

“Self and Others” by Jenna Norton
Although not an artwork I actively dislike it was another artwork let down in its presentation. The work in itself is interesting in its aesthetic. Or at least it would be if all the mystery and intrigue wasn’t stripped away so brazenly by the hulking piece of machinery in front of it.

“Fit for Purpose?” by Matthew Wardell
I HATE video art, I’m sorry I do. There are exceptions to the rule, I really liked Emma.W.Harris’s “FoxRabbit” which was playing on the entrance TV screen to the show but as I rule I don’t like it which is why I am limiting myself to one comment on this work. Simply because my personal opinion on video art colours all reviews of it and my companions were simply confused by the piece and didn’t get it. Why wasn’t the keystoning lined up. I am truly terrible with technology and even I can line up the keystone on a projector.

“Orpheus & Eurydice” by Grace Travis
Another work I am going to limit my opinion on simply because one of my companions was very vocal with his opinion on the work in front of the artist and I was quite embarrassed and run away rather than stay in the awkward zone to watch the work fully. I had tried earlier in the evening to watch the video but at the time the headphone splitter meant no sound was coming out into the headphones and when I went back (before the awkward moment) I was too distracted by the background noise where the sound was not recorded properly.

“Untitled” by Alice Dummons
Although intrigued by Isabella Rinaldi’s Untitled board game I want to know why exactly it was untitled and if I was meant to play it why was it on a podium with the board game instructions and pieces on the floor beside it. Wouldn’t a table with chairs (or as another artist used, cushions) to sit on make more sense. I’m quite a fan of interactive art but this wasn’t set up to be comfortably interactive and the use of a podium gave it sculpture connotations rather than interactive art. Also as someone who has made her own board game I know how easy it is to double side print on cardboard to make board game cards so sticking two pieces of paper back to back is unforgiveable. Especially when the board itself (and some of the playing pieces) was made so nicely and etched into acrylic. An interesting piece I was disappointed with the execution of.

“Untitled” by David Cantrill
I was initially awestruck by this piece, simply from the novel presentation and overall appeal. Every aspect of this work impressed and pleased me…until I went around the back. Why go to all the effort of hanging a work in the centre of a gallery space and having nothing on the back? Although I think if my expectations had been met and the work had continued on the other side my mind might literally have been blown so maybe the slight disappointment saved my life, we’ll never know. Although next time I see a work displayed in this manner I at least expect a clear back!

“Untitled” by Josh Bryan
My Everymen companions spent 5 minutes simply staring and trying to work out the story behind this piece. They eventually settled on the opinion that they liked it and it was some artistic rendition of a brain and they liked it. I was unsure. Until the work was explained to me: Training his right arm and left arm to perform the same actions the artist stands close up to the centre of a large piece of paper and holding a pen in each hand simply draws to his arms reach. Fascinating to hear about and to view. Although I wish this piece had a title or some other way of explaining this element of the work. Or even a live art element? Even though I hate live art! Also the masking tape doesn’t do much for me in the presentation element.

“Untitled” by Esther Dominguez
I really liked this work, until I got close enough to see the pixilation in the printing. Such a shame after the lovely layout and mounting of the work.

“Untitled” by Wendy White
And this is a work I actually like. Simply on its aesthetic value and how it was hung. How you have hung your work shouldn’t impact your piece, which is why I hate pinned work, far too intrusive, and this work I could simply enjoy. It was something I wouldn’t deem amiss seeing it at a proper gallery on the wall of an art collectors house.
And to finish on a high note my four favourite works!


“Untitled” by Tracey Drew
Definitely not what you would call traditionally displayed but I absolutely LOVED these, as did everyone I talk to. Slightly kitsch but it was just so intriguing and aesthetically pleasing. The urge to roll them out to see more was almost overwhelming. Maybe I’m just a sucker for patterns and weaving and interesting displays? My favourite is definitely the burnt pattern. The one person I found who wasn’t over the moon about this work at least respected it and was impressed by the amount of thought and time which went into it. A respect I hope to convey in my work!

“Breast Surgery” by Keniikki Lymch
Another work which I can respect and love simply from the skill an technique of it’s execution. This work probably fascinated me the most out of all the work in the show. Images of her personal surgery were laser etched into wood and displayed in a series. A great example of the importance of titling and technically impressive as well as thought provoking and aesthetically intriguing.

“Surgical Party” by Gemma Bowie
Another work I actually liked (shock, horror I know!) The attention to detail, titling and general ambience of the piece appealed to me in so many ways. Breaking from traditional framed prints and paintings in the wall can definitely work. I just wish I had more photographs showing the aforementioned attention to detail, such as the hearts and livers in jars on well sized and spaced shelves around the room, the spilled wine oozing like blood from the cake ‘body; on the table. My only regret is that I didn’t work up the courage to try some of the delicious looking cake in case we weren’t supposed to.

“Enter Wonderland-Chapter 2” by Chelsea Smith
And I have saved the best for last, or at least my personal favourite. I loved this work so much I had to hunt out the artist to tell her, and ended up commissioning a work for my personal art collection. I loved the style so much I could even ignore the intrusion of the pins and the way it hurt my artistic soul knowing the pictures would be forever scarred with pinholes. It was also quite refreshing to find another artist consistently accused of her work being too illustrative; an issue I will be addressing in a later blog post.
*If I had time and photos enough I would have reviewed all 67 plus works in the mid year show but I don’t think my inbox could take that amount of hate mail. Remember it’s part of the artistic process to deal with critics, and be gentle.*